Telegraph apologises and pays out in Dr Al-Haddad “apes and pigs” libel claim

Telegraph apologises and pays out in Dr Al-Haddad “apes and pigs” libel claim

Leading UK Imam and Scholar Dr Haitham Al-Haddad has succeeded in his three-year libel battle against the Telegraph over claims that he preached that Jews were descended from apes and pigs.

In terms of settlement filed in the High Court this week, the Telegraph has agreed to make a statement withdrawing the allegations and apologising; an undertaking not to republish or repeat the allegations; agreed to remove all references to Dr Al-Haddad from the Telegraph’s online publication of the articles complained of; and paid £62,500 towards Dr Al-Haddad’s legal costs.

The Sunday Telegraph had published a series of articles during 2015, which it continued to publish online, which variously claimed that Dr Al-Haddad had described Jews as “the descendants of apes and pigs”, and the “brethren of swine and pigs”.

Dr Al-Haddad, a nationally and internationally prominent scholar, academic and jurist, brought defamation proceedings against the Telegraph at the start of 2016. This settlement concludes that litigation, in which Saracens Solicitors, instructing Mark Henderson of Doughty Street Chambers, along with David Lemer for part of the case, acted for Dr Al-Haddad. David Price QC acted for the Telegraph.

Dr Al-Haddad said:

“It has taken 3 years to get justice – I’m glad to be able to finally put this behind me. My family and I would like to thank the Saracens Legal team and Mark from Doughty Street who have fought to expose the truth throughout – It was never about money – It was about clearing my name. I am happy to explain Islamic beliefs and I recognise that there are some who oppose my beliefs. I will debate with anyone in a fair forum, but I draw the line when national media organisations put false words into my mouth. I hope this result will demonstrate that newspapers cannot publish uncorroborated purported ‘facts’ about me and other UK Muslims with impunity. The propagation of falsehoods does nothing to help the inter faith dialogue and understanding to which I am committed.”

Notes

The Telegraph’s retraction and full apology was published on page 2 of the print edition of the Sunday Telegraph on 23 June 2019, and is published online here. As required by the terms of settlement filed at the High Court, all references to Dr Al-Haddad have been removed from the continuing online publication of the articles complained of.

Mark Henderson, along with David Lemer, were instructed by Nishtar Saleem, partner at Saracens – click here for more about his team and their defamation work.

Dr Al-Haddad had settled an earlier libel claim against the BBC for a similar allegation broadcast by BBC presenter Andrew Neil on BBC1. The BBC published a statement that “It has withdrawn this allegation and confirms that it will not repeat it.” See more on this here.

Continue Reading

Ending a Tenancy Without Court Proceedings: The Deed of Surrender Explained

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 28 September 2026   A deed of surrender is a formal legal document, signed by both landlord and tenant, that brings a tenancy to an end by agreement and confirms the tenant has no further rights to occupy the property, without the landlord needing […]

Can a Disputed Debt Stop a Winding-Up Petition? What Company Directors Need to Know

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 28 September 2026   Disputing the exact amount of a debt is generally not enough on its own to stop a company from being wound up. To successfully halt liquidation proceedings, a company must show that liability for the debt itself is genuinely disputed […]

Unfair Prejudice Petitions: Why There’s No Time Limit to Bring a Claim

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 24 September 2026   Unfair prejudice petitions are unusual in English litigation because there is no statutory limitation period restricting when a shareholder can bring one, unlike almost every other civil claim, which must generally be issued within a fixed number of years of […]

Form 3A: What Landlords Need to Know About the New Section 8 Possession Notice

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 24 September 2026   Form 3A is now the prescribed notice landlords must use to begin possession proceedings under section 8 of the Housing Act 1988, and it has replaced the previous Form 3 with immediate effect. If you or your managing agent have […]

Do I Have to Go to Court? Mediation & Dispute Resolution Explained

Written by Amani Mahmoud, Foreign Qualified Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 1 September 2026 Most Civil Disputes Settle Before Trial If you have watched A Few Good Men, Suits or Legally Blonde, you might assume that every legal dispute ends with a dramatic courtroom showdown. However, the reality is very different. If you […]

Why Monthly Rent Payments Help Landlords Evict Faster Under Section 8

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 24 August 2026   Setting rent to be payable monthly, rather than quarterly or at another longer interval, gives landlords a meaningfully faster route to eviction under section 8 of the Housing Act 1988 for rent arrears. This is because the mandatory ground for […]

Transfer Possession Order to High Court for Faster Eviction Enforcement

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 10 August 2026   If you already have a possession order but the county court’s bailiffs are taking months to enforce it, you can apply to transfer enforcement of that order to the High Court, where enforcement officers typically act far more quickly, often […]

ESG Disputes: Can You Be Sued for Your Supply Chain’s Carbon Footprint?

As we move through 2026, the era of “voluntary” sustainability reporting has come to an abrupt end. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria have transitioned from marketing slogans to hard legal obligations. For directors and legal teams, the most significant shift isn’t what is happening within their own four walls—it is what is happening miles […]

UK Contract Disputes: Practical Options, Time Limits & Costs

Summary Your options: negotiate, mediation/ADR, or litigate (Small Claims, Fast, Intermediate, Multi‑track). Time limits: usually 6 years for simple contracts, 12 years if executed as a deed (Limitation Act 1980). Consumer issues: rights and unfair terms governed by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (with CMA guidance on fairness). Costs & tracks: Small Claims up to […]

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Name(Required)