Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court defamation claim brought by Huda Television Ltd (Huda), an educational television channel aimed at the UK Muslim community. In addition to paying libel damages to Huda plus legal costs, HJS has published a retraction of the
allegations and an apology to Huda on the HJS website (where it will remain) and on Twitter.

Huda brought libel proceedings after HJS published a report titled “Extremism on the Airwaves:?Islamist broadcasting in the UK”, with accompanying news release and Twitter promotion, on 21 November 2018. HJS, which describes itself as “a think tank that produces expert research on the threats to our security”, said that its report “explores how Islamist extremists use our broadcast networks to further their radical agenda.” Huda’s Claim contended that HJS had called for it to face more regulatory intervention based on false allegations about it hosting Islamist extremist content.

Following a consent order, the statement issued by HJS explains that HJS had alleged that Huda’s “channel regularly publishes content containing Islamist extremist subject matter” but that HJS accepted that “This was incorrect” and “No such content appears on Huda’s website”.

HJS also admitted that it was “wrong” to claim that Huda “almost ubiquitously host well-known extremist speakers” and that its claim that nine allegedly extremist speakers had appeared on the channel “was incorrect in relation to the majority of the speakers identified” who had not appeared on Huda at all. HJS blamed a case of mistaken identity.

In its published retraction, HJS accepted that it had identified Huda “as one of the channels that we stated “have faced an ‘insufficient’ and ‘concerning’ lack of regulatory scrutiny” in the UK”, but that it now “accept[ed] that these matters were not a basis for stating that Huda Television Limited
should have faced greater regulatory scrutiny”.

HJS has stated that “We apologise to Huda Television Limited for all the incorrect statements made, and in light of this, we have agreed to pay Huda damages and legal costs”.

A link to the apology can be found here:
https://twitter.com/HJS_Org/status/1303746489638940674?s=20 and on the HJS website at https://henryjacksonsociety.org/errataandcorrigenda/

Jamil Rashid, director of Huda, spoke about his relief at the apology and payment of damages:
“The publication of the 2018 report falsely accusing Huda of extremism has had a massive effect on me personally and on the company. The last 2 years have been a nightmare. The allegations that The Henry Jackson Society made were completely untrue and today’s apology has completely exonerated us. This should serve as an example to everyone, especially The Henry Jackson Society that they cannot smear anyone with lies and inaccurate reporting and if they do, they will pay a price for it.

I would like to thank all the people who have championed me throughout this struggle for vindication, including my friends and family. I would also like to give a special thank you to the defamation team @SaracensSolicitors and Mark Henderson @DoughtyStPublic”.

Continue Reading

Ending a Tenancy Without Court Proceedings: The Deed of Surrender Explained

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 28 September 2026   A deed of surrender is a formal legal document, signed by both landlord and tenant, that brings a tenancy to an end by agreement and confirms the tenant has no further rights to occupy the property, without the landlord needing […]

Can a Disputed Debt Stop a Winding-Up Petition? What Company Directors Need to Know

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 28 September 2026   Disputing the exact amount of a debt is generally not enough on its own to stop a company from being wound up. To successfully halt liquidation proceedings, a company must show that liability for the debt itself is genuinely disputed […]

Unfair Prejudice Petitions: Why There’s No Time Limit to Bring a Claim

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 24 September 2026   Unfair prejudice petitions are unusual in English litigation because there is no statutory limitation period restricting when a shareholder can bring one, unlike almost every other civil claim, which must generally be issued within a fixed number of years of […]

Form 3A: What Landlords Need to Know About the New Section 8 Possession Notice

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 24 September 2026   Form 3A is now the prescribed notice landlords must use to begin possession proceedings under section 8 of the Housing Act 1988, and it has replaced the previous Form 3 with immediate effect. If you or your managing agent have […]

Do I Have to Go to Court? Mediation & Dispute Resolution Explained

Written by Amani Mahmoud, Foreign Qualified Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 1 September 2026 Most Civil Disputes Settle Before Trial If you have watched A Few Good Men, Suits or Legally Blonde, you might assume that every legal dispute ends with a dramatic courtroom showdown. However, the reality is very different. If you […]

Why Monthly Rent Payments Help Landlords Evict Faster Under Section 8

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 24 August 2026   Setting rent to be payable monthly, rather than quarterly or at another longer interval, gives landlords a meaningfully faster route to eviction under section 8 of the Housing Act 1988 for rent arrears. This is because the mandatory ground for […]

Transfer Possession Order to High Court for Faster Eviction Enforcement

Written by Maxim Sealey, Associate Solicitor · SRA-regulated · Last reviewed 10 August 2026   If you already have a possession order but the county court’s bailiffs are taking months to enforce it, you can apply to transfer enforcement of that order to the High Court, where enforcement officers typically act far more quickly, often […]

ESG Disputes: Can You Be Sued for Your Supply Chain’s Carbon Footprint?

As we move through 2026, the era of “voluntary” sustainability reporting has come to an abrupt end. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria have transitioned from marketing slogans to hard legal obligations. For directors and legal teams, the most significant shift isn’t what is happening within their own four walls—it is what is happening miles […]

UK Contract Disputes: Practical Options, Time Limits & Costs

Summary Your options: negotiate, mediation/ADR, or litigate (Small Claims, Fast, Intermediate, Multi‑track). Time limits: usually 6 years for simple contracts, 12 years if executed as a deed (Limitation Act 1980). Consumer issues: rights and unfair terms governed by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (with CMA guidance on fairness). Costs & tracks: Small Claims up to […]

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Name(Required)