
Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?
Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of
In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
The European General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) came into force on 25 May 2018 in order to give us more control over our personal data by unifying data regulations for businesses across the European Union (EU).
It applies to businesses that regularly monitor or process personal information of EU citizens. Saracens Solicitors already complies with the Data Protection Act 1998 and the SRA rules on confidentiality.
Saracens Solicitors is a Data Controller of Personal Data.
Personal Data is any information that relates to an identifiable individual including any data by which an individual can be identified.
This includes the individual’s name, personal details, economic, financial or social data, emails, IP or social media addresses
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court defamation claim brought by Huda Television Ltd (Huda), an educational television channel aimed at the UK Muslim community. In addition to paying libel damages to Huda plus legal costs, HJS has published a retraction of the
allegations and an apology to Huda on the HJS website (where it will remain) and on Twitter.
Huda brought libel proceedings after HJS published a report titled “Extremism on the Airwaves:?Islamist broadcasting in the UK”, with accompanying news release and Twitter promotion, on 21 November 2018. HJS, which describes itself as “a think tank that produces expert research on the threats to our security”, said that its report “explores how Islamist extremists use our broadcast networks to further their radical agenda.” Huda’s Claim contended that HJS had called for it to face more regulatory intervention based on false allegations about it hosting Islamist extremist content.
Following a consent order, the statement issued by HJS explains that HJS had alleged that Huda’s “channel regularly publishes content containing Islamist extremist subject matter” but that HJS accepted that “This was incorrect” and “No such content appears on Huda’s website”.
HJS also admitted that it was “wrong” to claim that Huda “almost ubiquitously host well-known extremist speakers” and that its claim that nine allegedly extremist speakers had appeared on the channel “was incorrect in relation to the majority of the speakers identified” who had not appeared on Huda at all. HJS blamed a case of mistaken identity.
In its published retraction, HJS accepted that it had identified Huda “as one of the channels that we stated “have faced an ‘insufficient’ and ‘concerning’ lack of regulatory scrutiny” in the UK”, but that it now “accept[ed] that these matters were not a basis for stating that Huda Television Limited
should have faced greater regulatory scrutiny”.
HJS has stated that “We apologise to Huda Television Limited for all the incorrect statements made, and in light of this, we have agreed to pay Huda damages and legal costs”.
A link to the apology can be found here:
https://twitter.com/HJS_Org/status/1303746489638940674?s=20 and on the HJS website at https://henryjacksonsociety.org/errataandcorrigenda/
Jamil Rashid, director of Huda, spoke about his relief at the apology and payment of damages:
“The publication of the 2018 report falsely accusing Huda of extremism has had a massive effect on me personally and on the company. The last 2 years have been a nightmare. The allegations that The Henry Jackson Society made were completely untrue and today’s apology has completely exonerated us. This should serve as an example to everyone, especially The Henry Jackson Society that they cannot smear anyone with lies and inaccurate reporting and if they do, they will pay a price for it.
I would like to thank all the people who have championed me throughout this struggle for vindication, including my friends and family. I would also like to give a special thank you to the defamation team @SaracensSolicitors and Mark Henderson @DoughtyStPublic”.
The Times Newspaper has today published an apology, amended its article and agreed to pay libel damages and legal costs to the former CEO of Al Rayan Bank, Mr Sultan Choudhury OBE for wrongly suggesting that he held extremist views. The apology is published both online and in print.
Mr Choudhury is highly regarded in the banking industry internationally for his pioneering style, charitable work and impeccable character. He was awarded an OBE by Her Majesty the Queen in 2017.
On 5 August 2019, The Times published an article online and in print under the headline “Female Circumcision is like clipping a nail, claimed speaker”. The abbreviated version published on The Times’ unrestricted website included a photograph of Mr Choudhury and his name. The positioning of his name and picture alongside the headline was misleading and libellous. This abbreviated version of the article was made available worldwide via the Internet and was also published by The Times on its Twitter feed.
The wholly false inference was that Mr Choudhury had made comments about Female Genital Mutilation. He has never made these comments and personally finds them abhorrent.
Mr Choudhury complained to IPSO and pursued a defamation claim against The Times. He contended that a publisher was not entitled to rely on a link to a full article which the ordinary Internet user was prevented from accessing because it was behind a paywall.
As a result of the publication, Mr Choudhury has been subjected to public censure including numerous hateful online comments. This has caused Mr Choudhury and his family huge distress particularly as his wife is a GP who deals with the everyday consequences of illegal FGM in her work.
Following The Times publishing the apology, Sultan Choudhury OBE commented:
“I was utterly shocked by The Times article. It presented me in a way which was completely wrong. The story broke without warning whilst I was on holiday causing my family and I great personal distress. By unjustly associating me with extremist views such as the repulsive quote on female circumcision (an illegal practice my wife deals with as part of her work as a GP) we were all devastated. As a result of that article, I suffered graphic personal abuse from all over the world, which was incredibly hurtful and upsetting to all of us. Thankfully, The Times has now publicly apologised after a long and difficult process.
I would like to thank my family and friends that stood by me throughout this. I would also like to thank my legal team for everything that they have done.”
Mr Sultan Choudhury was represented by Abtin Yeganeh & Nishtar Saleem of Saracens Solicitors and Mr Mark Henderson of Doughty Street Chambers.
Nishtar Saleem commented on the settlement and its implications:
‘This is another example of irresponsible journalism. Publishing sensational excerpts on a ‘free site’ whilst concealing the full article behind a paywall is a dangerous game. By taking this stand, Mr Choudhury has shown publishers that they cannot avoid responsibility for libellous material, paywall or no paywall. I am glad The Times has recognised its errors and apologised for what it has done. Going forward, greater accuracy and transparency is needed or others will suffer the same fate as Sultan Choudhury. Lessons must be learned.”
The Times Newspaper’s apology was published on page 30 of the print edition of The Times on 21 July 2020 and is published online here.
An extract appears here:
“…we reported that a speaker at the Institute, Mr Assim al-Hakim had expressed views on female genital mutilation (Female circumcision is like clipping a nail, claimed speaker, 5 August 2019). This headline appeared above a picture of Mr Sultan Choudhury in the online edition. Any impression that those views were his was not intended. Mr Choudhury did not say that “Female circumcision is like clipping a nail” (as explained in the full version of the article published in print and online). The article explained that he did not support any alleged extremist views. We apologise for any distressed caused to Mr Choudhury and have agreed to pay him compensation and legal costs.”
Please be aware that a fraudster using the name ‘Martin Edwards’ has been masquerading as Saracens Solicitors Debt Recovery (based in Luton) and has unlawfully threatened to seize goods from members of the public for purported unpaid debts.
We would like to warn members of the public against paying money or revealing any personal information to them.
Please note that no such company exists nor is it connected to Saracens Solicitors in any way. Our Debt Recovery department is not based in Luton and nobody by the name of Martin Edwards works for Saracens Solicitors.
Members of the public receiving calls from Saracens Solicitors Debt Recovery based in Luton, “Martin Edwards” or somebody going by a different name in similar circumstances, should immediately call us on 020 3588 3525 to notify our Risk Manager, and also report the matter to the Police and Action Fraud.
You may also wish to notify the Solicitors Regulation Authority. We confirm having reported this incident already.
Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in what is known as Schrems II, the legitimacy
In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government issued a press release pertaining to proposed changes to leasehold laws in
Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/135501579873/ The UK has opened its doors to Hong Kong citizens. The much anticipated
The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court defamation claim brought by Huda Television Ltd (Huda), an educational television channel aimed at the
The Times Newspaper has today published an apology, amended its article and agreed to pay libel damages and legal costs to the former CEO of
Please be aware that a fraudster using the name ‘Martin Edwards’ has been masquerading as Saracens Solicitors Debt Recovery (based in Luton) and has unlawfully threatened to seize goods from members of the public for purported unpaid debts. We would
Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of...
Read MoreIn January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,...
Read MoreBook your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here:...
Read MoreThe Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court...
Read MoreSince the decision last July (2020) by the Court of...
In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,...
Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here:...
The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court...
Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of...
Read MoreIn January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,...
Read MoreBook your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here:...
Read MoreThe Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court...
Read MoreSince the decision last July (2020) by the Court of Justice of......
In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local......
Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/135501579873/ ......
The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court defamation claim......
Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of...
Read MoreFebruary 26, 2021In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,...
Read MoreFebruary 10, 2021Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here:...
Read MoreJanuary 20, 2021The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court...
Read MoreSeptember 10, 2020Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in what is known as Schrems II, the legitimacy …
In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government issued a press release pertaining to proposed changes to leasehold laws in …