Skip to content
  • +44 20 3588 3500
Contact Us
Menu
  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Personal Clients
      • Civil Litigation
        • Dispute Resolution
        • Inheritance, Wills & Probate
        • Insolvency
        • Media & Intellectual Property
        • Negligence
        • Property
      • Divorce & Family Law
        • Pre-Nuptial Agreement
        • Legal Separation
        • Annulment
        • Divorce
        • Child Custody
        • Domestic Violence
      • Employment
        • Employment Contract
        • Compromise Agreement
        • Constructive Dismissal
        • Redundancy
        • Discrimination
        • Wrongful Termination
      • Estate Planning, Wills & Probate
        • Asset Protection
        • Power of Attorney
        • Probate & Estate Administration
        • Wills
      • Immigration
        • Entry into the UK
        • Immigration Appeal
        • Remaining/Settling in the UK
      • Personal Injury
        • Holiday Accidents
        • Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Claim
        • Civil Action Against the Police
        • Industrial Disease Claims
        • Product Injury Claims
        • Road Traffic Accidents
        • Workplace Accidents
      • Mortgage/Conveyancing
        • Auction Property
        • Buying Property
        • Selling Property
        • Leasing Property
        • Remortgage
        • Shared Ownership
        • Tenancy Agreements
    • Business Clients
      • Banking & Finance
        • Loan Agreement & Debt Finance
        • Project & Asset Based Finance
        • Restructuring
        • Shari’ah Compliant Finance
      • Commercial Law
        • Business Law
        • Charities
        • Company Law
        • Corporate Recovery & Insolvency
        • Healthcare Sector
      • Commercial Property
        • Sale/Purchase of Commercial Premise
        • Commercial Leases / Business Tenancy
        • Planning / Section 106
      • Commercial Litigation
        • Dispute Resolution & Mediation
        • Debt Recovery
        • Commercial Insolvency
        • Commercial Property
        • Media & Intellectual Property
      • Corporate Crime & Risks
        • Commercial Fraud
        • Money Laundering
        • VAT, Tax & Duty Fraud
      • Employment
        • Employment Contracts
        • Employment Litigation
    • Luxury Assets
      • Aircrafts
      • Fine Arts, Antiques & Collectibles
      • Cars
      • Helicopters
      • Racehorses
      • Jewellery and Watches
      • Couture Clothing
      • Yachts
  • About Us
  • Testimonials
  • Our Team
  • Work With Us
    • Recruitment Procedure
    • Trainee Recruitment
    • Vacancies
    • Consultants Programme
  • Insights
    • Personal Clients
      • Civil Litigation
      • Divorce & Family Law
      • Employment
      • Estate Planning, Wills & Probate
      • Immigration
      • Personal Injury
      • Mortgage/Conveyancing
    • Business Clients
      • Banking & Finance
      • Commercial Law
      • Commercial Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Corporate Crime & Risks
      • Employment
    • Luxury Assets
      • Aircraft
      • Fine Art
      • Antiques & Collectibles
      • Cars
      • Helicopters
      • Racehorses
      • Jewellery & Watches
      • Yachts
  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Personal Clients
      • Civil Litigation
        • Dispute Resolution
        • Inheritance, Wills & Probate
        • Insolvency
        • Media & Intellectual Property
        • Negligence
        • Property
      • Divorce & Family Law
        • Pre-Nuptial Agreement
        • Legal Separation
        • Annulment
        • Divorce
        • Child Custody
        • Domestic Violence
      • Employment
        • Employment Contract
        • Compromise Agreement
        • Constructive Dismissal
        • Redundancy
        • Discrimination
        • Wrongful Termination
      • Estate Planning, Wills & Probate
        • Asset Protection
        • Power of Attorney
        • Probate & Estate Administration
        • Wills
      • Immigration
        • Entry into the UK
        • Immigration Appeal
        • Remaining/Settling in the UK
      • Personal Injury
        • Holiday Accidents
        • Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Claim
        • Civil Action Against the Police
        • Industrial Disease Claims
        • Product Injury Claims
        • Road Traffic Accidents
        • Workplace Accidents
      • Mortgage/Conveyancing
        • Auction Property
        • Buying Property
        • Selling Property
        • Leasing Property
        • Remortgage
        • Shared Ownership
        • Tenancy Agreements
    • Business Clients
      • Banking & Finance
        • Loan Agreement & Debt Finance
        • Project & Asset Based Finance
        • Restructuring
        • Shari’ah Compliant Finance
      • Commercial Law
        • Business Law
        • Charities
        • Company Law
        • Corporate Recovery & Insolvency
        • Healthcare Sector
      • Commercial Property
        • Sale/Purchase of Commercial Premise
        • Commercial Leases / Business Tenancy
        • Planning / Section 106
      • Commercial Litigation
        • Dispute Resolution & Mediation
        • Debt Recovery
        • Commercial Insolvency
        • Commercial Property
        • Media & Intellectual Property
      • Corporate Crime & Risks
        • Commercial Fraud
        • Money Laundering
        • VAT, Tax & Duty Fraud
      • Employment
        • Employment Contracts
        • Employment Litigation
    • Luxury Assets
      • Aircrafts
      • Fine Arts, Antiques & Collectibles
      • Cars
      • Helicopters
      • Racehorses
      • Jewellery and Watches
      • Couture Clothing
      • Yachts
  • About Us
  • Testimonials
  • Our Team
  • Work With Us
    • Recruitment Procedure
    • Trainee Recruitment
    • Vacancies
    • Consultants Programme
  • Insights
    • Personal Clients
      • Civil Litigation
      • Divorce & Family Law
      • Employment
      • Estate Planning, Wills & Probate
      • Immigration
      • Personal Injury
      • Mortgage/Conveyancing
    • Business Clients
      • Banking & Finance
      • Commercial Law
      • Commercial Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Corporate Crime & Risks
      • Employment
    • Luxury Assets
      • Aircraft
      • Fine Art
      • Antiques & Collectibles
      • Cars
      • Helicopters
      • Racehorses
      • Jewellery & Watches
      • Yachts
Menu
  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Personal Clients
      • Civil Litigation
        • Dispute Resolution
        • Inheritance, Wills & Probate
        • Insolvency
        • Media & Intellectual Property
        • Negligence
        • Property
      • Divorce & Family Law
        • Pre-Nuptial Agreement
        • Legal Separation
        • Annulment
        • Divorce
        • Child Custody
        • Domestic Violence
      • Employment
        • Employment Contract
        • Compromise Agreement
        • Constructive Dismissal
        • Redundancy
        • Discrimination
        • Wrongful Termination
      • Estate Planning, Wills & Probate
        • Asset Protection
        • Power of Attorney
        • Probate & Estate Administration
        • Wills
      • Immigration
        • Entry into the UK
        • Immigration Appeal
        • Remaining/Settling in the UK
      • Personal Injury
        • Holiday Accidents
        • Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Claim
        • Civil Action Against the Police
        • Industrial Disease Claims
        • Product Injury Claims
        • Road Traffic Accidents
        • Workplace Accidents
      • Mortgage/Conveyancing
        • Auction Property
        • Buying Property
        • Selling Property
        • Leasing Property
        • Remortgage
        • Shared Ownership
        • Tenancy Agreements
    • Business Clients
      • Banking & Finance
        • Loan Agreement & Debt Finance
        • Project & Asset Based Finance
        • Restructuring
        • Shari’ah Compliant Finance
      • Commercial Law
        • Business Law
        • Charities
        • Company Law
        • Corporate Recovery & Insolvency
        • Healthcare Sector
      • Commercial Property
        • Sale/Purchase of Commercial Premise
        • Commercial Leases / Business Tenancy
        • Planning / Section 106
      • Commercial Litigation
        • Dispute Resolution & Mediation
        • Debt Recovery
        • Commercial Insolvency
        • Commercial Property
        • Media & Intellectual Property
      • Corporate Crime & Risks
        • Commercial Fraud
        • Money Laundering
        • VAT, Tax & Duty Fraud
      • Employment
        • Employment Contracts
        • Employment Litigation
    • Luxury Assets
      • Aircrafts
      • Fine Arts, Antiques & Collectibles
      • Cars
      • Helicopters
      • Racehorses
      • Jewellery and Watches
      • Couture Clothing
      • Yachts
  • About Us
  • Testimonials
  • Our Team
  • Work With Us
    • Recruitment Procedure
    • Trainee Recruitment
    • Vacancies
    • Consultants Programme
  • Insights
    • Personal Clients
      • Civil Litigation
      • Divorce & Family Law
      • Employment
      • Estate Planning, Wills & Probate
      • Immigration
      • Personal Injury
      • Mortgage/Conveyancing
    • Business Clients
      • Banking & Finance
      • Commercial Law
      • Commercial Property
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Corporate Crime & Risks
      • Employment
    • Luxury Assets
      • Aircraft
      • Fine Art
      • Antiques & Collectibles
      • Cars
      • Helicopters
      • Racehorses
      • Jewellery & Watches
      • Yachts
+44 20 3588 3500

Employment Insights

April 22, 2020

Employment rate at new record high.

Employment

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Read More
International-data-transfers

Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of

Read More »

UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

  In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,

Read More »
February 10, 2021

Corporate Hiring Since last decade

February 10, 2021

Work Agreement Policies

Blogs

February 10, 2021

Employment rate at new record high.

Employment

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Read More
February 10, 2021

Illegal Termination

Employment

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Read More

Vlogs

February 10, 2021

Employment rate at new record high.

Employment

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Read More
February 10, 2021

Employment rate at new record high.

Employment

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Read More

Podcast

February 10, 2021

Corporate Hiring

February 10, 2021

Termination Disputes

February 10, 2021

Corporate Environment

The European General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) came into force on 25 May 2018 in order to give us more control over our personal data by unifying data regulations for businesses across the European Union (EU).

It applies to businesses that regularly monitor or process personal information of EU citizens. Saracens Solicitors already complies with the Data Protection Act 1998 and the SRA rules on confidentiality.

Saracens Solicitors is a Data Controller of Personal Data.

Personal Data is any information that relates to an identifiable individual including any data by which an individual can be identified.

This includes the individual’s name, personal details, economic, financial or social data, emails, IP or social media addresses

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

1

Interactive Cards

A new concept of showing content in your web page with more interactive way.
More

Cool Headline

A new concept of showing content in your web page with more interactive way.

Read More

Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

February 26, 2021 No Comments
Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in what is known as Schrems II, the legitimacy of international data transfers to outside of the EU has once again been thrown into question. What Has This Got To Do with My Business? You may be wondering what this has to do with you and your business? You might be surprised to learn that the chances are, it very much does. The reason for this is as follows. Many cloud and service providers use servers which are based outside of the EU. Whilst some have now moved their data inside the EU, or have an option for you to choose where your data is stored, many are still based in the US (or outside the EU). Which is a potential problem and could put your business in breach of both EU and UK data protection laws (since the UK Data Protection Act 2018 largely follows the GDPR (or General Data Protection Regulation)). Decision in Schrems II Without going into the detail of why Max Schrems took Facebook to court and what the court decided (if you want to read more about that, see here), the decision in Schrems II effectively means:
  • the EU-US Privacy Shield is now invalidated (the Privacy Shield allowed data to be transferred from the EU (and from the UK, when we were in the EU) to the US, provided the US importer had voluntarily registered itself for the Privacy Shield scheme)
  • the only method now of transferring data to third countries like the US (assuming there has been no adequacy decision by the EU Commission[1] and ignoring Binding Corporate Rules[2]) is using EU standard contractual clauses (or SCCs for short).
However, the current SCCs are arcane, largely inappropriate in today’s world and therefore under review by the EU Commission. They will be superseded later this year most likely, so contracts containing SCCs will need to be updated again when this happens (but cannot be before). It doesn’t stop there: you also now have to be an expert in surveillance laws and both the exporter and importer need to decide if the destination country’s laws are “essentially equivalent” to EU data protection laws (an easy task!), by doing the following:
  • if you conclude that the third country does not pass the ‘equivalence’ test, you need to identify and adopt supplementary measures to bring it to the level of “essential equivalence”, e.g. through the use of encryption or pseudonymisation, or by adding layers of contractual obligations on the parties or using other organisational methods
  • if there are no supplementary measures which will help, then the data should not be transferred (or if it is is already being transferred, those transfers must stop immediately)
  • whatever the position above, you need to keep the situation under review, in case things change, e.g. the third country obtains (or loses) adequacy status (see footnote 1) or its laws or practices (eg in relation to surveillance) change
Conclusion Since Schrems II, the law in relation to data transfers has become even more complex and compliance is difficult if not challenging. Failing to carry out an appropriate assessment in relation to the destination or importing country can get the data exporter into hot water with the supervisory data protection authorities, result in fines and a prohibition on any further transfers of data to your chosen data importer, putting your business at risk. We are experts in international data transfers and can assist in the review, regularisation and drafting of standard contractual clauses as part of a data processing agreement (as well as updating them when the EU Commission approves the new versions of the SCCs due out later in 2021). Should you require further assistance or advice in relation to data transfers, please do not hesitate to contact Brian Miller on +44 (0)203 588 3538 or bmiller@saracenssolicitors.co.uk This note is intended to be general guidance of the law and not a substitute for tailored advice in individual circumstances. © Brian Miller, February 2021   [1] This is where the EU Commission determines a country’s data protection laws are largely equivalent to those of the EU and may therefore be added to the list of countries which have an adequate level of protection [2] Binding Corporate Rules (or BCRs) are a method whereby (usually) a multi-national company can legitimise transfers between one legal entity to another, where each is in a different jurisdiction and where at least one is usually outside of the EU.

UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

February 10, 2021 No Comments
  In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government issued a press release pertaining to proposed changes to leasehold laws in the UK. This is being hailed as one of the “biggest reforms to English Property Law for 40 years”, and with the introduction of the legislation, it is set to make UK homeownership fairer and more secure. In this post, we answer your top 12 questions about the new UK Leaseholder Rights. We’ll talk about what they are, when they will come into force, and more.

What are the current rules on lease extensions?

Under the current rules, you can request to extend a lease at any time. The rules for houses are slightly different from apartments. If you qualify, you can request to extend a lease on a house for 50 years or 90 years if you own a flat. According to current law, the owner/s of the leasehold house could be entitled to a 50-year extension without having to pay a premium for doing so. However, it is likely that the payable ground rent will increase, and once the lease is extended, a more modern (likely higher) level of ground rent will become payable. If you own a leasehold flat, the law is slightly different. There is the option to take either a formal or informal route to extend a lease. So long as certain criterion is met, a leaseholder can extend a lease under law via the formal route. Or it is possible to try and informally negotiate the terms of a lease with the freeholder directly.

How will the rules change?

Under current UK law, homeowners have to contend with high ground rents alongside their mortgage payments. Freeholders are legally permitted to raise the amount of ground rent they charge; without actually offering a relative benefit for the additional costs. These changes mean that a leaseholder choosing to do a lease extension on their home will not have to pay ground rent to the freeholder. In some cases, this has the potential to save leaseholders thousands, if not tens of thousands of pounds. There are other changes afoot too. • Leaseholders will now be able to extend their lease, with zero ground rent, up to a maximum term of 990 years. Compared to the current 90-year extension term, this is a sizeable difference. The same will apply to retirement properties, but the commencement of the latter will occur at a later date. • Existing leaseholders already in possession of a long lease will be permitted to buy-out the ground rent, with no need to extend the lease term. • A new online calculator will be introduced to help leaseholders understand the cost of purchasing their freehold land vs. extending their lease. The calculator will show the new ‘prescribed’ calculation rates that have been designed to be cheaper, fairer, and more transparent. • An intent to abolish the highly prohibitive costs associated with marriage value. While this will not actually abolish marriage value, the impact of this change aims to transfer 100% of the marriage value to the leaseholder/s.

When will the changes come into force?

On January 11th, it was announced in Government that there would need to be two pieces of legislation introduced. Imminently, the first bill in the forthcoming session will set ground rents to zero. If all goes to plan, this should happen around Springtime. While an exact date is still unclear, it is stated that these changes will be written into law ‘as soon as possible’.

What is marriage value, and how is it calculated?

Marriage value is a figure that reflects the additional market value of an extended lease. It is the increase in property value following the lease extension completion. At present, this potential profit will be shared equally between the landlord and the leaseholder. If you apply for a leasehold extension, you will, in effect, be getting issued with a new lease that has an additional number of years added onto the remaining term. Although the terms and conditions will be the same as your old lease, you will only be required to pay something known as a ‘peppercorn’ rent; and this is usually set to zero. This does benefit the leaseholder above the freeholder because they lose their annual rent. As such, when extending a lease the freeholder is entitled to a share of 50% of the marriage value at the point you get the new lease. Marriage value is only a factor if there are less than 80 years remaining on a lease. If it is above this, then the marriage value will be zero. However, if you have less than 80 years, and marriage value is a consideration, here’s a summary of how it is calculated. To establish what the marriage value is, you should work out the difference between these two amounts. The total value of: • The leaseholder’s interest under any current lease • Any immediate interests prior to the new lease being granted • The landlord’s/freeholder’s interest in the property prior to the granting of the new lease The total value of: • The leaseholder’s interest under any the new lease • Any remaining immediate interests once the new lease is granted • The landlord’s/freeholder’s interest in the property once the new lease is granted

When will the abolition of marriage value come into force?

It is thought that the first phase of these changes will take place in Spring 2021, but this is not likely to include the abolition of marriage value. It could be much closer to the 2024 elections. However, it is important to note that the Government has neither confirmed nor denied this timeframe.

What is the online leasehold calculator, and when will it be available?

There is no firm date as of yet, but the Government has said they hope to do this as soon as possible. Once the springtime changes start to become closer to implementation, it’s likely we will start to see some solid commitments in terms of realistic timeframes.

My ground rent rises significantly throughout the term of the lease. If I extend the lease or purchase the freehold, will I need to pay to move to zero ground rent?

According to the reform’s proposal, a premium will still need to be paid in order to move to zero ground rent. At present, it isn’t particularly clear or easy to find out how much this would be. However, the introduction of the new online calculator will make the process of finding out the cost to do this quick and easy. Following the implementation of the reforms, ground rent will be capped at 0.1% of the value of the freehold.

What is ‘development value’?

The development value relates to any potential developments that a leaseholder could do after the acquisition of the freehold. For instance, should a leaseholder acquire the freehold of a house that was previously converted into apartments, they could potentially unlock value by converting the apartments back into a single dwelling. According to the new reforms that are being proposed, a leaseholder will be able to agree to restrict any future developments on their property voluntarily as this will avoid the need to pay anything for the development value.

What are the ‘calculation rates’?

Different rates are used in order to calculate a freehold’s value, or the lease extension will be set by the Government according to a current market value. At present, the rates could be ascertained through valuation surveyors; and in many cases, this leads to disputes that cost further time and money.

Am I able to change my ground rent to zero today?

In accordance with the new reforms that are being proposed, legislation is due to be put forward in the next parliamentary session with a view to setting all future lease ground rents to zero. If you are already a leaseholder, at present, the only way to amend the ground rent would be by paying a premium and extending your lease via the present-day statutory process – which would reduce ground rent to a peppercorn. The only alternative solution would be the negotiation of an informal lease extension directly with the freeholder/landlord.

I have already begun the statutory process of a lease extension. Will it be best to withdraw and await the new reforms?

There is no straight answer, and what is best for one person would depend on their individual circumstances. Ultimately, there is a wide range of factors that could impact your decision to extend a lease, be that a re-mortgage, an urgent house sale, or something else. You may well have spent money in the process already, and depending on how far along you are, this will give you a better indication of whether or not withdrawing is a better option. Expert valuation guidance from a property solicitor will be a good course of action to take if you’re in this scenario right now.

I was planning to serve notice on my landlord and begin the statutory process of a lease extension soon; should I wait for the reforms?

Again, this is another question where there is no straight answer without knowing the individual circumstances. There could be other factors pressing a quick decision, so it would be advisable to speak with a legal professional at this point to discuss any individual or compelling circumstances. As you can appreciate, Springtime isn’t too far away. It is at this point we expect the initial phase of these reforms to go through Parliament and be brought into law. As for the other changes, although these are expected to take a few years, they could be brought into effect (in part) sooner than the estimate of 2024. If you have any further questions or you’d like to get personal guidance from a legal professional as to what the new leaseholder rights could mean for you, please contact a member of the residential team at Saracens Solicitors on 0203 588 3500.

Hong Kong BN(O) Visa – Top 11 Questions & Answers

January 20, 2021 No Comments
Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/135501579873/   The UK has opened its doors to Hong Kong citizens. The much anticipated visa welcomes your ideas, culture and heritage. In this post we answer the top 11 most frequently asked questions about the BN(O) visa. 1. Who can apply? The BN(O) visa is for British National (Overseas) citizens who are resident in Hong Kong or the UK. You must be a BNO citizen under the Hong Kong (British Nationality) order 1986. 2. When can I apply? You can apply from 31 January 2021. 3. Can my family members apply? Yes, the following family members can apply as your dependant(s):
  1. Spouse
  2. Unmarried partner who has lived with you for at least two years
  3. Children (under the age of 18) who form part of your household
  4. Grandchildren (under the age of 18) who form part of your household
  5. Adult Dependent Relatives (parents, grandparents, brothers, sisters, sons or daughters) in exceptional circumstances where there is a high level of dependency
4. Can I apply from inside the UK? Yes, you can apply from inside and outside the UK. 5. Can I switch from a student or work visa to the BN(O) visa? Yes, if you are already on a UK visa you can switch to a BN(O) visa. 6. How long does the BN(O) visa last for? You can apply to enter or remain in the UK for a period of 30 months (which you can extend by a further 30 months) or a period of 5 years. 7. Is there an English language requirement? There is no English Language requirement for the initial application. 8. What is the financial requirement for this visa? You must show that you can accommodate and financially support yourself and your family members for at least 6 months in the UK. 9. Will I need to take a Tuberculosis (TB) test? Hong Kong residents must provide a TB test certificate from an approved centre. 10. Can I work, study and settle in the UK under the BN(O) route? Yes, BN(O) visa holders can work and study in the UK and apply for settlement after 5 years. 11. Can I combine my previous leave in the UK with my leave under the BN(O) route to meet the 5-year residence period requirement? Yes, you can combine the years spent under your previous leave to meet the settlement requirement provided that your most recent grant of permission must have been on the Hong Kong BN(O) route.   Contact our Immigration Specialists   If you require expert advice regarding the BN(O) visa, contact our Immigration Specialists on +4420 3588 3500 or complete our enquiry form below.

Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

September 10, 2020 No Comments

The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court defamation claim brought by Huda Television Ltd (Huda), an educational television channel aimed at the UK Muslim community. In addition to paying libel damages to Huda plus legal costs, HJS has published a retraction of the
allegations and an apology to Huda on the HJS website (where it will remain) and on Twitter.


Huda brought libel proceedings after HJS published a report titled “Extremism on the Airwaves:?Islamist broadcasting in the UK”, with accompanying news release and Twitter promotion, on 21 November 2018. HJS, which describes itself as “a think tank that produces expert research on the threats to our security”, said that its report “explores how Islamist extremists use our broadcast networks to further their radical agenda.” Huda’s Claim contended that HJS had called for it to face more regulatory intervention based on false allegations about it hosting Islamist extremist content.


Following a consent order, the statement issued by HJS explains that HJS had alleged that Huda’s “channel regularly publishes content containing Islamist extremist subject matter” but that HJS accepted that “This was incorrect” and “No such content appears on Huda’s website”.


HJS also admitted that it was “wrong” to claim that Huda “almost ubiquitously host well-known extremist speakers” and that its claim that nine allegedly extremist speakers had appeared on the channel “was incorrect in relation to the majority of the speakers identified” who had not appeared on Huda at all. HJS blamed a case of mistaken identity.


In its published retraction, HJS accepted that it had identified Huda “as one of the channels that we stated “have faced an ‘insufficient’ and ‘concerning’ lack of regulatory scrutiny” in the UK”, but that it now “accept[ed] that these matters were not a basis for stating that Huda Television Limited
should have faced greater regulatory scrutiny”.


HJS has stated that “We apologise to Huda Television Limited for all the incorrect statements made, and in light of this, we have agreed to pay Huda damages and legal costs”.


A link to the apology can be found here:
https://twitter.com/HJS_Org/status/1303746489638940674?s=20 and on the HJS website at https://henryjacksonsociety.org/errataandcorrigenda/


Jamil Rashid, director of Huda, spoke about his relief at the apology and payment of damages:
“The publication of the 2018 report falsely accusing Huda of extremism has had a massive effect on me personally and on the company. The last 2 years have been a nightmare. The allegations that The Henry Jackson Society made were completely untrue and today’s apology has completely exonerated us. This should serve as an example to everyone, especially The Henry Jackson Society that they cannot smear anyone with lies and inaccurate reporting and if they do, they will pay a price for it.


I would like to thank all the people who have championed me throughout this struggle for vindication, including my friends and family. I would also like to give a special thank you to the defamation team @SaracensSolicitors and Mark Henderson @DoughtyStPublic”.

The Times publishes apology to Sultan Choudhury OBE and agrees to pay damages for libellous imputation on its free site

July 23, 2020 No Comments

The Times Newspaper has today published an apology, amended its article and agreed to pay libel damages and legal costs to the former CEO of Al Rayan Bank, Mr Sultan Choudhury OBE for wrongly suggesting that he held extremist views. The apology is published both online and in print.

Mr Choudhury is highly regarded in the banking industry internationally for his pioneering style, charitable work and impeccable character. He was awarded an OBE by Her Majesty the Queen in 2017.

On 5 August 2019, The Times published an article online and in print under the headline “Female Circumcision is like clipping a nail, claimed speaker”. The abbreviated version published on The Times’ unrestricted website included a photograph of Mr Choudhury and his name. The positioning of his name and picture alongside the headline was misleading and libellous. This abbreviated version of the article was made available worldwide via the Internet and was also published by The Times on its Twitter feed.

The wholly false inference was that Mr Choudhury had made comments about Female Genital Mutilation. He has never made these comments and personally finds them abhorrent.

Mr Choudhury complained to IPSO and pursued a defamation claim against The Times. He contended that a publisher was not entitled to rely on a link to a full article which the ordinary Internet user was prevented from accessing because it was behind a paywall.

As a result of the publication, Mr Choudhury has been subjected to public censure including numerous hateful online comments. This has caused Mr Choudhury and his family huge distress particularly as his wife is a GP who deals with the everyday consequences of illegal FGM in her work.  

Following The Times publishing the apology, Sultan Choudhury OBE commented:

“I was utterly shocked by The Times article.  It presented me in a way which was completely wrong. The story broke without warning whilst I was on holiday causing my family and I great personal distress.  By unjustly associating me with extremist views such as the repulsive quote on female circumcision (an illegal practice my wife deals with as part of her work as a GP) we were all devastated. As a result of that article, I suffered graphic personal abuse from all over the world, which was incredibly hurtful and upsetting to all of us.  Thankfully, The Times has now publicly apologised after a long and difficult process.

I would like to thank my family and friends that stood by me throughout this. I would also like to thank my legal team for everything that they have done.” 

Mr Sultan Choudhury was represented by Abtin Yeganeh & Nishtar Saleem of Saracens Solicitors and Mr Mark Henderson of Doughty Street Chambers.

Nishtar Saleem commented on the settlement and its implications:

‘This is another example of irresponsible journalism. Publishing sensational excerpts on a ‘free site’ whilst concealing the full article behind a paywall is a dangerous game. By taking this stand, Mr Choudhury has shown publishers that they cannot avoid responsibility for libellous material, paywall or no paywall. I am glad The Times has recognised its errors and apologised for what it has done. Going forward, greater accuracy and transparency is needed or others will suffer the same fate as Sultan Choudhury. Lessons must be learned.”

The Times Newspaper’s apology was published on page 30 of the print edition of The Times on 21 July 2020 and is published online here.

An extract appears here:

“…we reported that a speaker at the Institute, Mr Assim al-Hakim had expressed views on female genital mutilation (Female circumcision is like clipping a nail, claimed speaker, 5 August 2019). This headline appeared above a picture of Mr Sultan Choudhury in the online edition. Any impression that those views were his was not intended. Mr Choudhury did not say that “Female circumcision is like clipping a nail” (as explained in the full version of the article published in print and online). The article explained that he did not support any alleged extremist views. We apologise for any distressed caused to Mr Choudhury and have agreed to pay him compensation and legal costs.”

NOTICE – Fraudulent Caller Alert

July 7, 2020 No Comments

Please be aware that a fraudster using the name ‘Martin Edwards’ has been masquerading as Saracens Solicitors Debt Recovery (based in Luton) and has unlawfully threatened to seize goods from members of the public for purported unpaid debts.

We would like to warn members of the public against paying money or revealing any personal information to them.

Please note that no such company exists nor is it connected to Saracens Solicitors in any way. Our Debt Recovery department is not based in Luton and nobody by the name of Martin Edwards works for Saracens Solicitors.

Members of the public receiving calls from Saracens Solicitors Debt Recovery based in Luton, “Martin Edwards” or somebody going by a different name in similar circumstances, should immediately call us on 020 3588 3525 to notify our Risk Manager, and also report the matter to the Police and Action Fraud.

You may also wish to notify the Solicitors Regulation Authority. We confirm having reported this incident already.

International-data-transfers
Commercial Law
IT

Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in what is known as Schrems II, the legitimacy

Read More »
February 26, 2021 No Comments
Mortgage/Conveyancing
Fraz

UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

  In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government issued a press release pertaining to proposed changes to leasehold laws in

Read More »
February 10, 2021 No Comments
Immigration
Nishtar Saleem

Hong Kong BN(O) Visa – Top 11 Questions & Answers

Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/135501579873/   The UK has opened its doors to Hong Kong citizens. The much anticipated

Read More »
January 20, 2021 No Comments

Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court defamation claim brought by Huda Television Ltd (Huda), an educational television channel aimed at the

Read More »
September 10, 2020 No Comments

The Times publishes apology to Sultan Choudhury OBE and agrees to pay damages for libellous imputation on its free site

The Times Newspaper has today published an apology, amended its article and agreed to pay libel damages and legal costs to the former CEO of

Read More »
July 23, 2020 No Comments

NOTICE – Fraudulent Caller Alert

Please be aware that a fraudster using the name ‘Martin Edwards’ has been masquerading as Saracens Solicitors Debt Recovery (based in Luton) and has unlawfully threatened to seize goods from members of the public for purported unpaid debts. We would

Read More »
July 7, 2020 No Comments


    International-data-transfers

    Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

    Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of...

    Read More
    ITFebruary 26, 2021

    UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

      In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,...

    Read More
    FrazFebruary 10, 2021

    Hong Kong BN(O) Visa – Top 11 Questions & Answers

    Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here:...

    Read More
    Nishtar SaleemJanuary 20, 2021

    Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

    The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court...

    Read More
    Nishtar SaleemSeptember 10, 2020
    International-data-transfers

    Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

    Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of...

    Read More
    IT
    February 26, 2021

    UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

      In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,...

    Read More
    Fraz
    February 10, 2021

    Hong Kong BN(O) Visa – Top 11 Questions & Answers

    Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here:...

    Read More
    Nishtar Saleem
    January 20, 2021

    Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

    The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court...

    Read More
    Nishtar Saleem
    September 10, 2020
    International-data-transfers

    Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

    Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of...

    Read More
    IT
    February 26, 2021

    UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

      In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,...

    Read More
    Fraz
    February 10, 2021

    Hong Kong BN(O) Visa – Top 11 Questions & Answers

    Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here:...

    Read More
    Nishtar Saleem
    January 20, 2021

    Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

    The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court...

    Read More
    Nishtar Saleem
    September 10, 2020
    • All
    International-data-transfers

    Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

    Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of Justice of......

    UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

      In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local......

    Hong Kong BN(O) Visa – Top 11 Questions & Answers

    Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/135501579873/  ......

    Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

    The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court defamation claim......

    Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

    Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of...

    Read MoreFebruary 26, 2021

    UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

      In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities,...

    Read MoreFebruary 10, 2021

    Hong Kong BN(O) Visa – Top 11 Questions & Answers

    Book your place for our Hong Kong BN(O) webinar here:...

    Read MoreJanuary 20, 2021

    Henry Jackson Society pays libel damages and apologises to UK’s Huda Television Ltd

    The Henry Jackson Society (HJS) has settled the High Court...

    Read MoreSeptember 10, 2020
    International-data-transfers
    Commercial Law

    Is your business transferring data unlawfully outside the EU?

    Since the decision last July (2020) by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in what is known as Schrems II, the legitimacy …

    February 26, 2021
    Read More
    Mortgage/Conveyancing

    UK Leaseholder 2021 Reform and Rights – Questions & Answers

      In January of 2021, the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government issued a press release pertaining to proposed changes to leasehold laws in …

    February 10, 2021
    Read More
    1 2 3 … 5 Next »

    Contact Us

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

    Saracens Solicitors
    Strand Bridge House,
    140 Strand,
    London WC2R 1HH

    T: +44(0)20 3588 3500
    F: +44(0)20 3588 3505

    Legal Notice

    Privacy Policy

    Accessibility

    Saracens Solicitors
    Strand Bridge House,
    140 Strand,
    London WC2R 1HH

    T: +44(0)20 3588 3500
    F: +44(0)20 3588 3505

    Copyright  Saracens Solicitors | All Rights Reserved